Peru: Julio Guzman's presidential candidacy disqualified again
Posted by Colin Post on Mar 5, 2016 2 comments

Peru: Julio Guzman’s presidential candidacy disqualified again

Peru’s electoral board has overruled an earlier resolution which allowed presidential candidate Julio Guzman on the ballot in 2016 elections.

The National Elections Board (JNE) first barred Guzman on Feb. 15 for various procedural technicalities the Everybody for Peru political party did not complete in selecting Guzman as its presidential candidate. On Feb. 24, the JEE special elections tribunal, a division of the JNE, accepted party documentation of an internal democratic procedure, clearing the way for Guzman’s candidacy.

Since the Feb. 24 decision, political rivals and others filed 11 objections to the JEE decision in an attempt to remove Guzman from the ballot again. On Friday the JEE ruled that the objections were founded and that Guzman was ineligible to run for president of Peru in 2016.

The JEE resolution published on Friday ruled in favor of the objections raised against the Feb. 24 decision, citing internal irregularities at the Everybody for Peru political party. The objections focus on the party’s violating its own procedural rules in selecting Guzman as its candidate.

The party did not give party members nationwide enough notice for an extraordinary assembly in which the party’s statutes governing the national committee would be amended. The assembly held on Oct. 10 did not have enough party leaders registered with electoral authority to make quorum.

That assembly, which paved the way for the selection of the party’s national committee, has been ruled invalid for official party business. By not recognizing the party’s national committee, the JEE ruled it cannot recognize the body’s selection of Guzman as its presidential candidate in 2016.

Guzman and the Everybody for Peru party have until Monday to appeal the resolution.

“We are going to ask the courts to intervene through a protective action against this flagrant violation of our fundamental rights,” Guzman said after the JEE decision. “This is a message from the corrupt system that wants to cling to power and has no shame in using all possible way to do so. This is a blow to democracy and a fraud in advance.”

Guzman also said he would lead a series of public marches throughout Lima to protest the JEE decision. Supporters gathers in downtown Lima’s Plaza San Martin, where there was already a protest in progress to demand Lima mayor Luis Castañeda grant title to residents of informal land. The latter protest group briefly clashed with Guzman’s supporters, accusing them of taking advantage of their own presence.

“This shows [Guzman] can’t keep calm,” former President Alan Garcia said on Canal N. “It’s a little childish to blame others for the improvisation, disorder and confusion at his party and in the registration … Such a decision does not put the election or democracy in Peru in danger.”

The JEE’s announcement of its ruling in favor of objections against Guzman’s candidacy came on the same day the body disqualified presidential candidate Cesar Acuña for vote buying.

A recent Ipsos poll showed second-place candidate Guzman in a virtual tie with frontrunner Keiko Fujimori in a runoff. If Guzman and Acuña are kept out, the presidential election scheduled just five weeks away takes a completely new look. While Pedro Pablo Kuczynski and Alan Garcia remain the closest challengers, rising leftist candidates Veronika Mendoza and Alfredo Barnechea suddenly rank among the top five contenders with less than 5% of voter intentions each.

Peru’s general elections are scheduled for April 10.


RESOLUCION N° 019-2016-JEE-LC1/JNE (Jurado Electoral Especial)

Julio Guzmán anuncia marchas por fallo contra su candidatura (El Comercio)

Enfrentamiento en Plaza San Martín por marcha de Julio Guzmán (El Comercio)

Julio Guzmán sobre tachas: “Esto es un fraude anticipado” (El Comercio)

Alan García: “Fallo contra Guzmán no amenaza a la democracia” (El Comercio)

  • Nelson

    This mess ocurred 5 weeks before the elctions; when a presidential candidate is in second place, this is a model shame as a bad example of
    backward country where shows: weak, poor, informal the most important statute of the state, “The national electoral board,” discualified presidential candidates with five weeks before the election with a tie second round virtual polls, this sound a fraud: for the world, showing a weak democracy, and informal statute.

  • NinaPukiu

    Mr. Guzman’s party was notified weeks before the elections that his documentation was not correct and that it was irregular. Mr. Guzman decided that he was going to run, regardless. Mr. Guzman has no following, as has been proved by the recent calls for protests without ANY success.
    It has been proven that the so called 18% that he calls as proof of his legitimacy is on the news only. This is a marketing product of the neoliberal and corrupt people that want to destroy my country from within…right Nelson?