Natural gas production comes to off-the-grid regions
Posted by Daniel Sanchez on Oct 4, 2017 2 comments

Natural gas production comes to off-the-grid regions

Natural gas production comes to off-the-grid regions Lantera LNG facility under construction

Peru’s first small-scale liquefied natural gas (ssLNG) facility is about to open, which will provide a new energy production alternative that could revitalize industry in remote areas of the country.

In the last decade, ssLNG plants have emerged as a cost-effective alternative to large complexes and cross-country pipelines. Smaller and simpler to operate, these plants can tap into local natural gas reserves to provide a reliable, yet scalable, supply in off-the-grid areas.

U.S. company Okra Energy, through its Peruvian subsidiary Lantera Energy, is close to completing a ssLNG plant in an undisclosed location in northern Peru — the first of its kind in the country.

The company, which also bought Peruvian gas transportation and storage company Cryogas in mid-2017, aims to enter the energy market for industries and homes in areas that previously had no access to a reliable supply of energy, and at significantly lower costs than the alternatives.

“Constructing this plant is a significant achievement for both the LNG industry and the greater South American economy. Peruvians will now enjoy the benefits of a virtual pipeline that provides clean-burning natural gas energy that was previously inaccessible,” said Okra Energy CEO Louis Ravenet.

Production from the first plant, set to begin in early 2018, is almost wholly pre-sold to a steel manufacturing giant. The facility is mostly pre-made in a factory setting, lowering costs and making it easily scalable as demand changes in the region.

According to Okra, there are other ssLNG facilities in negotiation. Industries that were previously unable to access reliable, constant energy supplies in remote areas are able to commission a plant for their energy needs. In turn, these will attract investment and development to otherwise neglected regions. Surplus production can be easily transported by truck or via local ports to clients worldwide.

As clean energy moves up the priority ladder, natural gas is poised to overtake other fossil fuels due to its lower environmental impact and ssLNG extraction is becoming a viable option. Burning natural gas emits only a fraction of the CO2 that gasoline, diesel and coal do, and almost no sulfur, mercury, or particulates.

The caveats of natural gas are different; methane, a byproduct of natural gas extraction, is up to 86 times stronger at causing a greenhouse effect than CO2. Minimizing methane leakage from the extraction site requires state-of-the-art technology and operations. Similarly, some natural gas extraction processes can contaminate ground and surface waters and cause underground fracturing.

(Visited 259 times, 1 visits today)
  • Hello and thanks for the excellent summary of our project in Peru. I also appreciate your use of the Disqus comment application and will use it to offer the following observations and points regarding Okra Energy’s operations:

    1. Okra Energy does no extraction work; we are taking natural gas (NG) directly from a pipeline;
    2. Our clients are environmentally aware and are usually implementing natural gas to displace carbon-based fuels such as diesel, coal and heavy fuel oil, as natural gas produces considerably less pollution; and,
    3.. Natural gas significantly reduces the cost of energy. For developing or challenged economies, this reduction in the cost of energy leads to a cascade of enhancements in the quality of life for the everyday citizen as well as the population at large.

    Yes, methane is a stronger greenhouse gas compared to CO2. However to prevent methane from escaping into the environment, the answer is simple: Don’t vent. Minimizing or eliminating methane leakage from the extraction process is not complicated. Rather, capture methane using micro-LNG plants. This not only raises the quality of processing, it improves environment and quality of life for the surrounding area. (Note: I would argue that the term “state-of-the-art” is overused, suggesting some futuristic or difficult to implement technology; rather, small-scale or micro-LNG technology has been employed for decades now and is rapidly becoming the “new normal.”)

    —Louis Ravenet, CEO of Okra Energy LLC

  • Hello and thanks for the excellent summary of our project in Peru. I also appreciate your use of the Disqus comment application and will use it to offer the following observations and points regarding Okra Energy’s operations:

    1. Okra Energy does no extraction work; we are taking natural gas (NG) directly from a pipeline;
    2. Our clients are environmentally aware and are usually implementing natural gas to displace carbon-based fuels such as diesel, coal and heavy fuel oil, as natural gas produces considerably less pollution; and,
    3.. Natural gas significantly reduces the cost of energy. For developing or challenged economies, this reduction in the cost of energy leads to a cascade of enhancements in the quality of life for the everyday citizen as well as the population at large.

    Yes, methane is a stronger greenhouse gas compared to CO2. However to prevent methane from escaping into the environment, the answer is simple: Don’t vent. Minimizing or eliminating methane leakage from the extraction process is not complicated. Rather, capture methane using micro-LNG plants. This not only raises the quality of processing, it improves environment and quality of life for the surrounding area. (Note: I would argue that the term “state-of-the-art” is overused, suggesting some futuristic or difficult to implement technology; rather, small-scale or micro-LNG technology has been employed for decades now and is rapidly becoming the “new normal.”)

    —Louis Ravenet, CEO