Peru convicts journalist on World Press Freedom Day
Posted by Colin Post on May 4, 2016 1 comment

Peru convicts journalist on World Press Freedom Day

Peru convicts journalist on World Press Freedom Day Photo credit: El Comercio

A court in Peru found Caretas journalist Rafo Leon guilty of defamation on Tuesday for criticizing a former columnist for the newspaper, El Comercio.

A judge in Lima sentenced Leon to a suspended sentence of one year in prison and awarded $1,800 in damages to the plaintiff, former El Comercio editor Martha Meier. In a coincidence stranger than fiction, the verdict against Leon was read on World Press Freedom Day, which the United Nations declared to underscore the importance of free and independent media.

The suspended sentence is contingent on Leon’s completion of one year of “good behavior,” which requires him to appear to sign a judicial ledger every month and to notify the court if he plans to change his residence. Leon would also be required to request permission to leave the country.

“The thing is that this sentence is a sword of Damocles over my head, because the judge, or anyone, can consider something I wrote as libelous and condemn me,” Leon wrote on Facebook after the verdict. “Watch out. This is not only a threat against me. It is for all journalists, which is very serious for the precedent it establishes.”

Leon has vowed to appeal the verdict to Peru’s supreme court and international human rights organizations. The decision was condemned by politicians across the ideological spectrum as well as the ombudsman and the college of journalists.

The charge stems from an article in which Leon mounted a blistering attack on Meier and her 2014 column criticizing Lima’s then-mayor Susana Villaran. Leon’s article published in Caretas pitted Peru’s respected magazine against El Comercio, Peru’s oldest independent newspaper. Meier is the first cousin of El Comercio’s then-director Francisco Miro-Quesada.

“He who, before several people, together or separately, but in ways that can spread the news, attributes to a person an event, a quality or behavior that may damage his honor or reputation shall be punished with imprisonment not exceeding two years plus a 30- to 120-days fine,” reads Peru’s law on defamation.

The judge’s decision cited the American Convention on Human Rights in ruling that Leon had violated Meier’s right to honor and dignity.

Meier was fired from El Comercio in 2015 for an article in which she alleged judges and prosecutors had been bribed to dislodge anti-mining activist Maxima Acuña. The article also called George Soros a “promoter of drug traffickers.”

The Freedom House designated Peru as “Partly Free” in 2015, with a freedom score of 47, with 0 being completely free and 100 being not free at all.

“Politicians [in Peru] frequently react to criticism, such as allegations of corruption, by suing journalists, press outlets and activists. Defamation remains a criminal offense punishable by imprisonment, though sentences are frequently suspended,” reads the Freedom House profile on Peru.

The profile also highlights attacks on journalists by criminal gangs, the government’s inconsistent record on transparency and prohibitive broadcasting regulation which allows the government to block some media companies from obtaining licenses.


CODIGO PENAL (Ministerio de Justicia)

Sentencia Rafo León (Scribd)

Martha Meier fue separada de El Comercio por “columna difamatoria” sobre minera Yanacocha (La Republica)

Esto es lo que tiene que decir Rafo León sobre la sentencia en su contra (La Republica)

Peru (Freedom House)

Este es el artículo que Rafo León escribió sobre Martha Meier (RPP)

Rafo León: le ordenan cumplir reglas de conducta por un año (El Comercio)

Rafo León: ¿Qué significa el fallo contra el periodista? (El Comercio)

El síndrome de Susy, por Martha Meier Miró Quesada (El Comercio)

  • Philip Brown

    Every country needs FREEDOM OF SPEECH in order to inform citizens of issues that may be crucial to their – quality of life. While no one has the right to present knowingly false information, journalists have to be protected in bringing forth legitimate articles no matter whom they identify – from the president to the common person.